This object is in archive! 
Support for more http daemons
Completed
As a Hosting Provider, I want support for more http daemons, so that I can choose the httpd that best works with my configuration.
Offer a choice between Apache and the better performing HTTPDs such as lighttpd or ngnix. I know that this would be difficult to implement and also difficult from a strategic point of view
This is a feature that has been migrated over from the cPanel Forums. All previous comments and discussions concerning this feature can be located at:
nginx for accelerating Apache: http://forums.cpanel.net/f145/nginx-accelerating-apache-case-41719-a-134209.html
Cherokee: http://forums.cpanel.net/f145/cherokee-web-server-apache-alternative-98945.html
Lighttpd: http://forums.cpanel.net/f145/lighttpd-cpanel-135229.html
The EasyApache team has been working diligently on the EasyApache 4 system. The changes we've made to Config::apache will allow it to be easier to drop variant in web servers. This code will be included in 11.50.
If/When we provide another web daemon, it will most likely start with Nginx. We look forward to your feedback and how we can continue to improve cPanel & WHM's WebStack.
The EasyApache team has been working diligently on the EasyApache 4 system. The changes we've made to Config::apache will allow it to be easier to drop variant in web servers. This code will be included in 11.50.
If/When we provide another web daemon, it will most likely start with Nginx. We look forward to your feedback and how we can continue to improve cPanel & WHM's WebStack.
We can choose which mail server want to use, so why not allow us the same choice for http server? I know its hardly comparable as http will be more complex, but it's not impossible!
We can choose which mail server want to use, so why not allow us the same choice for http server? I know its hardly comparable as http will be more complex, but it's not impossible!
Though having the choice is nice, a lot comes to mind.
I can imagine compatibility issues with modules come in to play.
each server would requiring their own set of modules.
not to mention compatibility with things such as cloudlinux.
Though I support the idea, I'd like some insight to how much work this be to determine if it is feasible to even suggest it. At the very least i'd like to see support official support for a reverse-proxy setup.
Though having the choice is nice, a lot comes to mind.
I can imagine compatibility issues with modules come in to play.
each server would requiring their own set of modules.
not to mention compatibility with things such as cloudlinux.
Though I support the idea, I'd like some insight to how much work this be to determine if it is feasible to even suggest it. At the very least i'd like to see support official support for a reverse-proxy setup.
cpXstack ( cpxstack.sysally.net) implements the full nginX + PHP-FPM stack on cpanel
cpXstack ( cpxstack.sysally.net) implements the full nginX + PHP-FPM stack on cpanel
I'm particularly interested in implementing nginx. I second this feature!
I'm particularly interested in implementing nginx. I second this feature!
The EasyApache team has been working diligently on the EasyApache 4 system. The changes we've made to Config::apache will allow it to be easier to drop variant in web servers. This code will be included in 11.50.
If/When we provide another web daemon, it will most likely start with Nginx. We look forward to your feedback and how we can continue to improve cPanel & WHM's WebStack.
The EasyApache team has been working diligently on the EasyApache 4 system. The changes we've made to Config::apache will allow it to be easier to drop variant in web servers. This code will be included in 11.50.
If/When we provide another web daemon, it will most likely start with Nginx. We look forward to your feedback and how we can continue to improve cPanel & WHM's WebStack.
The methods and packages that allows us the ability to easily drop in replacement web servers is in 11.50.
Please note: This feature request is about support for more HTTP daemons. This is a giant wish for a single feature request. We'll be providing support for more daemons at a later date, however at this time, the requirement system is now in place.
The methods and packages that allows us the ability to easily drop in replacement web servers is in 11.50.
Please note: This feature request is about support for more HTTP daemons. This is a giant wish for a single feature request. We'll be providing support for more daemons at a later date, however at this time, the requirement system is now in place.
And... there is something we can try/test now on 11.52?
And... there is something we can try/test now on 11.52?
Replies have been locked on this page!