BIMI, adding another defence to dmarc DKIM and SPF
Not Planned
As a System Administrator, I would like to see BIMI added to the development roadmap as an email defense mechanism in addition to DKIM, Marc, and SPF so that our client emails do not get mistakenly marked as spam.
===============
Looks like this is the next email defence mechanism to be ready to apply.
Suggest for the road map to keep us out of the spam bin.
https://www.litmus.com/blog/what-is-bimi-and-why-should-email-marketers-care/
How to: https://mxtoolbox.com/dmarc/bimi/how-to-create-bimi-record
Anthony
I like this idea 
cPanel, WebHost Manager and WHM are registered trademarks of cPanel, L.L.C. for providing its computer software that facilitates the management and configuration of Internet web servers.
Howdy,
I could definitely see how we can make this more streamlined. It's not on our current roadmap, but in the interim you can manually create them by creating a TXT record to an already hosted file. It might be worth putting together a knowledge base article on how to do this with the current system until BIMI is more supported.
Dustin Scherer (he/him) | Product Owner | @dustinscherer
Howdy,
I could definitely see how we can make this more streamlined. It's not on our current roadmap, but in the interim you can manually create them by creating a TXT record to an already hosted file. It might be worth putting together a knowledge base article on how to do this with the current system until BIMI is more supported.
Dustin Scherer (he/him) | Product Owner | @dustinscherer
Replies have been locked on this page!